FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521  
2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541   2542   2543   2544   2545   2546   >>   >|  
ink, are Butler, Hurt, Weld, Wells, and S. S. Greene. [418] Dr. Blair, to whom Murray ought to have acknowledged himself indebted for this sentence, introduced _a noun_, to which, in his work, this infinitive and these participles refer: thus, "It is disagreeable _for the mind_ to be _left pausing_ on a word which does not, by itself, produce any idea."--_Blair's Rhetoric_, p. 118. See Obs. 10th and 11th on Rule 14th. [419] The perfect contrast between _from_ and _to_, when the former governs the participle and the latter the infinitive, is an other proof that this _to_ is the common preposition _to_. For example, "These are the four spirits of the heavens, which go forth _from standing_ before the Lord of all the earth."--_Zech._, vi, 5. Now if this were rendered "which go forth _to stand_," &c., it is plain that these prepositions would express quite opposite relations. Yet, probably from some obscurity in the original, the Greek version has been made to mean, "going forth _to stand_;" and the Latin, "which go forth, _that they may stand_;" while the French text conveys nearly the same sense as ours,--"which go forth _from the place where they stood._" [420] _Cannot_, with a verb of _avoiding_, or with the negative _but_, is equivalent to _must_. Such examples may therefore be varied thus: "I _cannot but mention_:" i.e., "I _must_ mention."--"I _cannot help exhorting_ him to assume courage."--_Knox_. That is, "I _cannot but exhort_ him." [421] See the same thing in _Kirkham's Gram._ p. 189; in _Ingersoll's_, p. 200; in _Smith's New Grammar_, p. 162; and in other modifications and mutilations of Murray's work. Kirkham, in an other place, adopts the doctrine, that, "_Participles_ frequently govern nouns _and_ pronouns in the possessive case; as, 'In case of his _majesty's dying_ without issue, &c.; Upon _God's having ended_ all his works, &c.; I remember _its being reckoned_ a great exploit; At my _coming_ in he said, &c."--_Kirkham's Gram._, p. 181. None of these examples are written according to my notion of elegance, or of accuracy. Better: "In case his _Majesty die_ without issue."--"_God_ having ended all his works."--"I remember _it was_ reckoned a great exploit."--"At my _entrance_, he said," &c. [422] We have seen that Priestley's doctrine, as well as Lowth's, is, that when a participle is taken _substantively_, "it ought not to govern another word;" and, for the same reason, it ought not to have an _adv
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521  
2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   2540   2541   2542   2543   2544   2545   2546   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Kirkham

 

participle

 

Murray

 

govern

 

examples

 

mention

 

doctrine

 

remember

 

infinitive

 

reckoned


exploit
 

written

 

exhorting

 
assume
 
exhort
 
Cannot
 

courage

 
accuracy
 

negative

 

elegance


avoiding

 

equivalent

 

varied

 

notion

 

Ingersoll

 

possessive

 

entrance

 

pronouns

 

Participles

 

frequently


coming
 
majesty
 
Priestley
 

Better

 

Majesty

 

reason

 

Grammar

 

substantively

 
adopts
 
mutilations

modifications

 

obscurity

 
Rhetoric
 

produce

 
governs
 

common

 
perfect
 

contrast

 

pausing

 
acknowledged