FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627  
628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   >>   >|  
the restrictive sense is well expressed by one relative, and the resumptive by an other. When neither of these senses is intended by the writer, _any_ form of the relative must needs be improper: as, "The greatest genius _which runs_ through the arts and sciences, takes a kind of tincture from them, and falls unavoidably into imitation."--_Addison, Spect._, No. 160. Here, as I suppose, _which runs_ should be _in running_. What else can the author have meant? OBS. 35.--Having now, as I imagine, clearly shown the difference between the restrictive and the resumptive sense of a relative pronoun, and the absolute necessity of making such a choice of words as will express that sense only which we intend; I hope the learner will see, by these observations, not merely that clearness requires the occasional use of each of our five relatives, _who, which, what, that_, and _as_; but that this distinction in the meaning, is a very common principle by which to determine what is, and what is not, good English. Thus _that_ and _as_ are appropriately our _restrictive_ relatives, though _who_ and _which_ are sometimes used restrictively; but, in a _resumptive_ sense, _who_ or _which_ is required, and required even after those terms which usually demand _that_ or _as_: thus, "We are vexed at the unlucky chance, and go away dissatisfied. _Such_ impressions, _which_ ought not to be cherished, are a sufficient reason for excluding stories of that kind from the theatre."--_Kames, El. of Crit._, ii, 279. Here _which_ is proper to the sense intended; but _such_ requires _as_, when the latter term limits the meaning of the former. In sentences like the following, _who_ or _which_ may be used in lieu of _that_; whether with any advantage or not, the reader may judge: "You seize the critical moment _that_ is favorable to emotion."--_Bair's Rhet._, p. 321. "_An_ historian _that_ would instruct us, must know when to be concise."--_Ib._, p. 359. "Seneca has been censured for the affectation _that_ appears in his style."--_Ib._, p. 367. "Such as the prodigies _that_ attended the death of Julius Caesar."--_Ib._, p. 401. "By unfolding those principles _that_ ought to govern the taste of every individual."--_Kames's Dedication to El. of Crit._ "But I am sure he has that _that_ is better than an estate."--_Spect._, No. 475. "There are two properties, _that_ characterize and essentially distinguish relative pronouns."--_Churchill's Gram._, p. 74. By the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627  
628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
relative
 

resumptive

 

restrictive

 

relatives

 

meaning

 

requires

 
intended
 
required
 

reader

 
excluding

cherished

 

moment

 
favorable
 

sufficient

 

critical

 

reason

 

advantage

 

proper

 
limits
 
emotion

sentences

 

theatre

 
stories
 
Seneca
 

Dedication

 

individual

 

principles

 
govern
 

estate

 

pronouns


distinguish

 

Churchill

 

essentially

 

characterize

 
properties
 

unfolding

 
concise
 

impressions

 
instruct
 

historian


censured

 

attended

 

Julius

 
Caesar
 

prodigies

 

affectation

 

appears

 

appropriately

 

author

 
running