FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  
d he has put your other piece into C. Kemble's hands (the piece you talk of offering Elliston) and C.K. sent down word that he had not yet had time to read it. So stand your affairs at present. Glossop has got the Murderer. Will you address him on the subject, or shall I--that is, Mary? She says you must write more _showable_ letters about these matters, for, with all our trouble of crossing out this word, and giving a cleaner turn to th' other, and folding down at this part, and squeezing an obnoxious epithet into a corner, she can hardly communicate their contents without offence. What, man, put less gall in your ink, or write me a biting tragedy! C. LAMB. [Here should come a letter from Lamb to Ayrton asking him to meet the Burneys and Paynes on Wednesday at half-past four.] LETTER 310 CHARLES LAMB TO JOHN HOWARD PAYNE February [9], 1823. My dear Miss Lamb--I have enclosed for you Mr. Payne's piece called Grandpapa, which I regret to say is not thought to be of the nature that will suit this theatre; but as there appears to be much merit in it, Mr. Kemble strongly recommends that you should send it to the English Opera House, for which it seems to be excellently adapted. As you have already been kind enough to be our medium of communication with Mr. Payne, I have imposed this trouble upon you; but if you do not like to act for Mr. Payne in the business, and have no means of disposing of the piece, I will forward it to Paris or elsewhere as you think he may prefer. Very truly yours, HENRY ROBERTSON. T.R.C.G., 8 Feb. 1823. Dear P---- We have just received the above, and want your instructions. It strikes me as a very merry little piece, that should be played by _very young actors_. It strikes me that Miss Clara Fisher would play the _boy_ exactly. She is just such a forward chit. No young _man_ would do it without its appearing absurd, but in a girl's hands it would have just all the reality that a short dream of an act requires. Then for the sister, if Miss Stevenson that was, were Miss Stevenson and younger, they two would carry it off. I do not know who they have got in that young line, besides Miss C.F., at Drury, nor how you would like Elliston to have it--has he not had it? I am thick with Arnold, but I have always heard that the very slender profits of the English Opera House do not admit of his giving above a trifle, or next to none, for a piece of this kind. Write me what I should
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

strikes

 

trouble

 

Elliston

 
giving
 
Stevenson
 

Kemble

 

forward

 

English

 
instructions
 

received


business
 

disposing

 

imposed

 

medium

 

communication

 

ROBERTSON

 

prefer

 

Arnold

 
trifle
 

slender


profits

 

younger

 

Fisher

 

played

 

actors

 

requires

 

sister

 

appearing

 

absurd

 

reality


Grandpapa

 

folding

 
squeezing
 

cleaner

 

matters

 

crossing

 

obnoxious

 
epithet
 
contents
 

offence


communicate

 
corner
 

letters

 

affairs

 
offering
 
present
 

Glossop

 

showable

 

Murderer

 

address