FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   >>  
anner, set on fire any _out-House_, _Barn_, _Stable_, _Leanto_, _Stack of Hay_, _Corn or Wood_, or any thing of like nature, whereby any _Dwelling House_, _Meeting House or Store House_ cometh to be burnt, the party or parties vehemently suspected thereof, shall be apprehended by Warrant from one or more of the Magistrates, and committed to Prison, there to remain without Baile, till the next Court of Assistants, who upon legal conviction by due proof, or confession of the Crime, shall adjudge such person or persons to be put to death, and to forfeit so much of his Lands, Goods or Chattels, as shall make full satisfaction, to the party or parties damnified. [1652.][18] [Footnote 18: Mass. Colony Laws, ed. 1672, p. 52.] It will be observed that the law prescribes no such punishment as was ordered by the Assistants, and how the court were satisfied of the legality of their sentence is to me inexplicable, except upon the possible claim that they might rightfully exercise the expansive discretion which they applied to the case of the first Quakers, and so supply a deficiency in the ordinances of the General Court, by administering the _lex talionis_[19] in this particular instance as a necessary terror to evil-doers. [Footnote 19: Exodus xxi. 25. "In all criminall offences, where the law hath prescribed no certaine penaltie, the judges have power to inflict penalties, according to the rule of God's word."--Declaration of the General Court: Hutch. Coll. Papers, p. 207. And see the first article of the Colonial "Liberties," in Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. viii. p. 216.] The public opinion which permitted the colonial magistrates to exercise, unchallenged, a discretion not given to them by positive law, as in this case and that of the first Quakers, and in the instance of their conviction of a capital crime, of Tom, the Indian, in 1674,[20] of whose guilt the jury were doubtful, cannot be deemed to have enlarged their authority, by _custom_, without a perversion of language and a disregard of fundamental distinctions relative to the nature and source of law.[21] [Footnote 20: Records of the Court of Assistants, 1674, p. 14.] [Footnote 21: By the stat. 8 Hen. VI. ch. 6, the burning of houses, after a threat to do so if money be not paid, &c., was made high treason, and the incendiary suffered as any other traitor; that is, if a woman, she was burned to death. But t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Assistants

 
conviction
 

General

 

Quakers

 

instance

 

discretion

 
exercise
 

nature

 

parties


Declaration

 

Colonial

 

Liberties

 
article
 
Papers
 

treason

 

certaine

 
penaltie
 

prescribed

 

criminall


offences
 

burned

 
judges
 

suffered

 

incendiary

 

penalties

 

traitor

 

inflict

 

threat

 
doubtful

deemed

 

enlarged

 

source

 
relative
 

disregard

 
fundamental
 
language
 

perversion

 

authority

 
custom

Records

 
Indian
 
opinion
 

permitted

 

colonial

 

magistrates

 

public

 
distinctions
 
houses
 

unchallenged