FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
nal negative. If they still yearn to let themselves be _seen_, as well as _read_, I would suggest that the frontispiece be the one page in the book to be uncut, so that their readers, should they wish to peep at the author's physiognomy for curiosity's sake, may--if that curiosity prove its own punishment--leave those first pages uncut until the book falls to pieces on the bookshelf. For myself, I hate to read some beautifully written thought, only to have the author's distinctly unbeautiful face always protruding between me and my delight--like some utterance of the commonplace in the middle of a discussion on "souls." I suppose it is that authors--like everybody else--cannot understand that how they look to themselves and to those who love them, and so are used to them, they will not necessarily look to other people, who merely want to gaze upon their photograph because they cannot look upon their waxwork. We all get so used to our own blemishes by seeing them every morning when we brush our hair that we have long since ceased to regard them seriously. But ten to one a stranger will notice nothing else. That is always the way of a stranger's regard. But, after all, to fail to impress someone who knows you and loves you is nothing at all; to fail, however, to impress someone who yearns to become acquainted with you, is very often to lose a possible friend. Better a thousand times that an adoring reader should keep yearning to know what her favourite author looks like than, having at last satisfied her curiosity, she should exclaim disappointedly, "_Gosh! To think that he could look like that!!_" If an author feels that indeed he must show the world what he looks like, let him issue to the public merely a "vague impression" of himself--a Cubist one for preference. A Cubist portrait can look like anything . . . but to look like anything is infinitely preferable to looking like _nothing on this earth_, isn't it? _Seaside Piers_ The only real excitement I can ever perceive about a Seaside Pier is when the sea washes half of it away. To me, Seaside Piers are the most deadly things. You pay tuppence to go on them, and you generally stay on them until you can stay no longer because--well, because you _have_ paid tuppence. Having walked along the dreary length of the tail-end which joins the shore, there seems really nothing to do at the end of your journey except to spit over the side. Of course, the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

author

 

Seaside

 
curiosity
 

Cubist

 

stranger

 

regard

 

impress

 

tuppence

 

satisfied

 

preference


portrait
 

yearning

 

exclaim

 

disappointedly

 

favourite

 

impression

 

public

 

length

 

dreary

 

walked


longer

 

Having

 

journey

 

generally

 

excitement

 

infinitely

 

preferable

 

perceive

 

reader

 
deadly

things

 
washes
 

written

 

thought

 

distinctly

 

unbeautiful

 

beautifully

 

pieces

 

bookshelf

 

protruding


middle

 

discussion

 

suppose

 

commonplace

 

utterance

 

delight

 

suggest

 
frontispiece
 

readers

 

negative