FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364  
365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   >>   >|  
ion in Mr. GROESBECK'S proposition: there is no provision whatever for the Territories. Mr. DENT:--I think the Conference had much better adhere to the section reported by the committee as it has been already amended. We have all read and studied that section. We understand it. A State that will not adopt the whole of the section will not adopt any part of it, and so there is no use in severing the subjects provided for. I am opposed to the adoption of the substitute. We understand the original article better than we can any other. Mr. WILMOT:--I think the original proposition the best; the word "regulate" has been struck out of it, leaving only the words "impair or abolish." Mr. McCURDY:--I ask leave to revive my motion. I regret having withdrawn it. I think I have the right to renew it now. The PRESIDENT (Mr. ALEXANDER in the chair):--The motion of the gentleman from Connecticut is out of order. Mr. CRISFIELD:--I understand we are now considering the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. GROESBECK). If so, I move to insert in his proposition after the word "abolish" the words "or impair." Mr. GROESBECK:--I think the amendment improves it. I will accept it. Mr. CHASE:--There is, certainly, a misunderstanding as to the effect of the vote laying the amendment offered by Mr. HITCHCOCK upon the table: it was offered as a substitute to the third section; if it did not carry the whole section to the table, then motions to amend that section are in order. In that view, I think Mr. McCURDY'S motion is in order either way: to amend the article proposed by the committee, or to amend the amendment of Mr. GROESBECK. Mr. RANDOLPH:--I think Mr. McCURDY'S motion is entirely out of order; it has once been passed by informally. Mr. CLEVELAND:--Is it not in order at any time to make a motion which will render the proposed substitute more perfect? Mr. McCURDY:--I do not wish my proposition ruled out upon any technical construction of rules. I will now move it as an addition to the third section. Mr. FOWLER:--I move to reconsider the vote adopting the motion proposed by the gentleman from Vermont (Mr. HALL). Mr. FIELD:--I oppose the motion. The amendment is both proper and necessary. It can certainly do no harm to the South; and if the South wishes to be fair, it will not object to it. Mr. CHITTENDEN:--I oppose the reconsideration of the vote adopting Mr. HALL'S amendment, and I will state very s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364  
365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

motion

 

section

 

amendment

 

GROESBECK

 
proposition
 
McCURDY
 

proposed

 

gentleman

 

substitute

 

offered


understand

 

article

 

abolish

 

impair

 

original

 

committee

 

oppose

 
adopting
 

CLEVELAND

 

passed


informally
 
motions
 

RANDOLPH

 

wishes

 

proper

 

reconsideration

 

object

 
CHITTENDEN
 

Vermont

 

reconsider


render

 
perfect
 

addition

 
FOWLER
 

HITCHCOCK

 

technical

 
construction
 
severing
 

subjects

 

provided


WILMOT

 

adoption

 

opposed

 

studied

 

Conference

 

Territories

 
provision
 

amended

 
reported
 

adhere