FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  
ng up pearls of smut from the Old Testament, they achieved a list of no less than 89 alleged floutings of the code--75 described as lewd and 14 as profane. An inspection of these specifications affords mirth of a rare and lofty variety; nothing could more cruelly expose the inner chambers of the moral mind. When young Witla, fastening his best girl's skate, is so overcome by the carnality of youth that he hugs her, it is set down as lewd. On page 51, having become an art student, he is fired by "a great, warm-tinted nude of Bouguereau"--lewd again. On page 70 he begins to draw from the figure, and his instructor cautions him that the female breast is round, not square--more lewdness. On page 151 he kisses a girl on mouth and neck and she cautions him: "Be careful! Mamma may come in"--still more. On page 161, having got rid of mamma, she yields "herself to him gladly, joyously" and he is greatly shocked when she argues that an artist (she is by way of being a singer) had better not marry--lewdness doubly damned. On page 245 he and his bride, being ignorant, neglect the principles laid down by Dr. Sylvanus Stall in his great works on sex hygiene--lewdness most horrible! But there is no need to proceed further. Every kiss, hug and tickle of the chin in the chronicle is laboriously snouted out, empanelled, exhibited. Every hint that Witla is no vestal, that he indulges his unchristian fleshliness, that he burns in the manner of I Corinthians, VII, 9, is uncovered to the moral inquisition. On the side of profanity there is a less ardent pursuit of evidences, chiefly, I daresay, because their unearthing is less stimulating. (Beside, there is no law prohibiting profanity in books: the whole inquiry here is but so much _lagniappe_.) On page 408, in describing a character called Daniel C. Summerfield, Dreiser says that the fellow is "very much given to swearing, more as a matter of habit than of foul intention," and then goes on to explain somewhat lamely that "no picture of him would be complete without the interpolation of his various expressions." They turn out to be _God damn_ and _Jesus Christ_--three of the latter and five or six of the former. All go down; the pure in heart must be shielded from the knowledge of them. (But what of the immoral French? They call the English _Goddams_.) Also, three plain _damns_, eight _hells_, one _my God_, five _by Gods_, one _go to the devil_, one _God Almighty_ and one plain _God_. Alto
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

lewdness

 

cautions

 

profanity

 

daresay

 

unearthing

 

chiefly

 

ardent

 

pursuit

 

evidences

 

inquiry


lagniappe

 

Beside

 

inquisition

 

prohibiting

 

stimulating

 

laboriously

 

chronicle

 

snouted

 
empanelled
 

tickle


Almighty

 
exhibited
 

Corinthians

 

uncovered

 

manner

 

vestal

 

indulges

 

unchristian

 

fleshliness

 
picture

lamely
 

shielded

 

explain

 

knowledge

 
complete
 
Christ
 
expressions
 

interpolation

 
English
 

Summerfield


Dreiser

 

Daniel

 

called

 

describing

 

character

 

Goddams

 

French

 

immoral

 

intention

 

matter