FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>  
rant is very much more likely to have been made by Claudius than by Nero, and more likely to belong to the earlier than to the later years of Claudius.] Thirty years later Agricola, who was obviously a better administrator than a general, openly encouraged the process. According to Tacitus, his efforts met with great success; Latin began to be spoken, the toga to be worn, temples, town halls, and private houses to be built in Roman fashion.[1] Agricola appears to have been merely carrying out the policy of his age. Certainly it is just at this period (about 75-85 A.D.) that towns like Silchester, Bath, Caerwent, seem to take definite shape,[2] and civil judges (_legati iuridici_) were appointed, presumably to administer the justice more frequently required by the advancing civilization.[3] In A.D. 85 it was thought safe to reduce the garrison by a legion and some auxiliaries.[4] Progress, however, was not maintained. About 115-20, and again about 155-63 and 175-80, the northern part of the province was vexed by serious risings, and the civilian area was doubtless kept somewhat in disturbance.[5] Probably it was at some point in this period that the flourishing country town of Isurium (Aldborough), fifteen miles from York, had to shield itself by a stone wall and ditch.[6] [Footnote 1: Tac. _Agr._ 21, quoted in note 3 to p. 13.] [Footnote 2: Silchester was plainly laid out in Roman fashion all at once on a definite street plan, and though some few of its houses may be older, the town as a whole seems to have taken its rise from this event. The evidence of coins implies that the development of the place began in the Flavian period (_Athenaeum_, Dec. 15, 1904). At Bath the earliest datable stones belong to the same time (_Victoria Hist. of Somerset_, vol. i, Roman Bath), the first being a fragmentary inscription of A.D. 76. At Caerwent the evidence is confined to coins and fibulae, none of which seem earlier than Vespasian or Domitian: for the coins see _Clifton Antiq. Club's Proceedings_, v. 170-82.] [Footnote 3: A. von Domaszewski, _Rhein. Mus._, xlvi. 599; C. ix. 5533 (as completed by Domaszewski), inscription of Salvius Liberalis; C. iii. 2864=9960, inscription of Iavolenus Priscus. Both these belong to the Flavian period. Other instances are known from the second century.] [Footnote 4: _Classical Review_, xviii. (1904) 458; xix. (1905) 58, withdrawal of Batavian cohorts. The withdrawal of _Legio ii Adiutrix_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 
period
 
inscription
 

belong

 

Flavian

 
definite
 
houses
 

earlier

 

fashion

 

Caerwent


Domaszewski

 
Silchester
 

Claudius

 

evidence

 
Agricola
 

withdrawal

 

quoted

 

fragmentary

 

datable

 

Somerset


earliest

 

stones

 

Victoria

 

Athenaeum

 

street

 
plainly
 
development
 

implies

 
instances
 

Iavolenus


Priscus

 

century

 

Classical

 

cohorts

 

Batavian

 
Adiutrix
 

Review

 

Liberalis

 

Salvius

 

Clifton


Domitian

 

fibulae

 
Vespasian
 

Proceedings

 

completed

 
confined
 
Certainly
 

policy

 

carrying

 
private