FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  
y, what guarantee is there that it is right in morals? If the Bible is not a reliable guide in facts, how do we know that it is a trustworthy guide in doctrine? However he may have arrived at his conclusions, it is extremely significant, in the light of these questions, that Dr. E. D. Burton, being willing to admit that the Bible is not infallible in history or in matters of science, has also concluded that it is not wholly consistent and therefore not ultimately and as a whole inerrant in the field of morals and religion. What reason more can the Church want to justify her for intolerance of a theory that will do this to a man's faith? Is it not correct reasoning to conclude that if one man suffers such a collapse of faith after accepting evolution, others are likely to suffer the same thing? And when the Church observes this collapse taking place in every quarter, and then discovers that back of it lies the theory of evolution, is she not justified for being intolerant of that thing which is gnawing at the vitals of her faith? What can she say else than that the teachers of evolution, at least in the Christian schools, must either give up evolution and come back to faith in an infallible Bible, or part company with the Church? It may be that one reason why the evolutionists are so loth to get out of company they do not belong in is because they fear that thereby they may lose their coveted reputation for scholarship. Prof. Howard W. Kellogg, formerly of Occidental College, hints as much when he says: Science has again and again set aside as untrustworthy the so-called discoveries of evolution, has compelled the great German evolutionist, Haeckel, to confess that his drawings of missing links were from imagination rather than from objects found, has driven him from his university chair, and has compelled him to admit that "Most modern investigators of science have come to the conclusion that the doctrine of evolution, and particularly of Darwinism, is in error and cannot be maintained,"--and yet in spite of such admissions from men recognized as authorities in their respective lines, the doctrine of evolution appears to rule as absolutely in the educational world as if it were not a moribund hypothesis, already discarded by many, and to be discarded by others when scientific evidence rather than reputation for scholars
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  



Top keywords:
evolution
 

doctrine

 

Church

 

theory

 

reputation

 

company

 

collapse

 
compelled
 

reason

 
infallible

morals

 

discarded

 

science

 

hypothesis

 

Occidental

 
College
 

moribund

 
educational
 

scholars

 

evidence


Science

 
belong
 

scientific

 

coveted

 

Howard

 

scholarship

 

untrustworthy

 
Kellogg
 

evolutionists

 

Darwinism


imagination
 

maintained

 
objects
 

modern

 

investigators

 

university

 

driven

 

admissions

 

appears

 

German


conclusion

 

discoveries

 

absolutely

 
respective
 
authorities
 

recognized

 
missing
 

drawings

 

confess

 

evolutionist