FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313  
314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   >>   >|  
taken place. The opposition to the Bill was concerted by Lord John Russell and Sir James Graham; see Parker's _Sir James Graham_, vol. ii. p. 236, and the observation of the Prince, _post_, 21st February, 1858. The purport of the Amendment was to postpone any reform in the criminal law till the French despatch had been replied to.] [Footnote 6: See Ashley's _Life of Lord Palmerston_, vol. ii. p. 146.] [Pageheading: RESIGNATION OF THE GOVERNMENT] [Pageheading: LORD DERBY SUMMONED] [Pageheading: OFFER TO LORD DERBY] _Memorandum by the Prince Albert._ BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _21st February 1858_. Lord Palmerston came at five o'clock from the Cabinet, and tendered his resignation in his own name, and that of his Colleagues. The Cabinet had well considered their position and found that, as the vote passed by the House, although the result of an accidental combination of parties, was virtually a vote of censure upon their conduct, they could not with honour or with any advantage to the public service carry on the Government. The combination was the whole of the Conservative Party (Lord Derby's followers), Lord John Russell, the Peelites, with Mr Gladstone and the whole of the Radicals; but the Liberal Party generally is just now very angry with Lord Palmerston personally, chiefly on account of his apparent submission to French dictation, and the late appointment of Lord Clanricarde as Privy Seal, who is looked upon as a reprobate.[7] Lord Clanricarde's presence in the House of Commons during the Debate, and in a conspicuous place, enraged many supporters of Lord Palmerston to that degree that they voted at once with the Opposition. [Footnote 7: Since his triumph at the polls in 1857, Lord Palmerston had been somewhat arbitrary in his demeanour, and had defied public opinion by taking Lord Clanricarde into the Government, after some unpleasant disclosures in the Irish Courts. While walking home on the 18th, after obtaining an immense majority on the India Bill, he was told by Sir Joseph Bethell that he ought, like the Roman Consuls in a triumph, to have some one to remind him that he was, as a minister, not immortal. Next day he was defeated.] The Queen wrote to Lord Derby the letter here following;[8] he came a little after six o'clock. He stated that nobody was more surprised in his life than he had been at the result of the Debate, af
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313  
314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Palmerston
 

Clanricarde

 

Pageheading

 

Cabinet

 
Government
 

Debate

 
triumph
 

public

 
result
 
combination

Russell

 

French

 

Graham

 

Footnote

 

Prince

 
February
 
surprised
 

opinion

 

demeanour

 
arbitrary

defied

 

reprobate

 

presence

 

Commons

 

looked

 

conspicuous

 

Opposition

 

stated

 
degree
 
enraged

supporters

 
Joseph
 

Bethell

 

defeated

 

appointment

 

immortal

 

remind

 
Consuls
 

majority

 
disclosures

unpleasant

 

minister

 

Courts

 
immense
 
letter
 

obtaining

 

walking

 

taking

 

GOVERNMENT

 

SUMMONED