FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467  
468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   >>   >|  
exceedingly brief, as we are sick of his sophisms, and long to be delivered from the pursuit of them. He encounters, at the outset, "a difficulty" in the legislation of the Congress of 1793 and in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States." But "on examination," says he, "this difficulty will disappear." Perhaps difficulty so great never vanished so suddenly from before any other man. The authority of the Congress of 1793, though it contained so many of the most distinguished framers of the Constitution, is annihilated by a few bold strokes of Mr. Sumner's pen. One short paragraph, containing two ineffably weak arguments, does the business. The first of these arguments is as follows: "The act of 1793 proceeded from a Congress that had already recognized the United States Bank, chartered by a previous Congress, which, though sanctioned by the Supreme Court, has been since in high quarters pronounced unconstitutional. If it erred as to the bank, it may have erred also as to fugitives from labor." We cannot conceive why such an argument should have been propounded, unless it were to excite a prejudice against the Congress of 1793 in the minds of those who may be opposed to a National Bank. For if we look at its conclusion we shall see that it merely aims to establish a point which no one would deny. It merely aims to prove that, as the Congress of 1793 was composed of fallible men, "so it may have erred!" We admit the conclusion, and therefore pass by the inherent weaknesses in the structure of the argument. His second argument is this: "But the very act contains a capital error[217] on this very subject, so declared by the Supreme Court, in pretending to vest a portion of the judicial power of the nation in state officers. _This error takes from the act all authority as an interpretation of the Constitution_. I DISMISS IT." This passage, considered as an argument, is simply ridiculous. How many of the best laws ever enacted by man have, in the midst of much that is as clear as noonday, been found to contain an error! Should all, therefore, have been blindly rejected? As soon as the error has been detected, has any enlightened tribunal on earth ever said, "I dismiss" the whole? By such a process we might have made as short work with Mr. Sumner's speech. If, after pointing out one error therein, we had dismissed the whole speech as worthless, we should have imitated his reasoning, and in our conclusi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467  
468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Congress
 

argument

 

Supreme

 

difficulty

 

Sumner

 

arguments

 

speech

 
Constitution
 

conclusion

 
United

States

 

authority

 

considered

 

nation

 

portion

 
judicial
 

officers

 
passage
 

DISMISS

 

interpretation


sophisms

 
delivered
 

inherent

 

fallible

 

composed

 

weaknesses

 

structure

 
simply
 

subject

 

declared


capital
 

pretending

 
exceedingly
 

process

 

dismiss

 

pointing

 

reasoning

 

conclusi

 

imitated

 

worthless


dismissed

 

noonday

 

enacted

 
detected
 
enlightened
 

tribunal

 
Should
 

blindly

 

rejected

 

ridiculous