FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  
o Lord Holland in the House of Lords, and said he had many apologies to make for what had passed, but that he really was in such a state of excitement he did not know what he said and did.[12] [11] [_Supra_, p. 192 (March 21st, 1829).] [12] [Lord Winchelsea was in the habit of flourishing a white pocket handkerchief while he was speaking in the House of Lords. This peculiarity; associated with his sonorous tones, his excited action, and his extravagant opinions, gave point to the incident.] [Page Head: DEBATE ON THE CATHOLIC BILL.] April 4th, 1829 {p.198} On the third reading of the Catholic Bill in the House of Commons Sadler failed, and Palmerston made a speech like one of Canning's. The Bill has been two nights in the House of Lords. They go on with it this morning, and will divide this evening. The Chancellor made a very fine speech last night, and the Bishop of Oxford spoke very well the night before, but the debate has been dull on the whole; the subject is exhausted. The House of Lords was very full, particularly of women; every fool in London thinks it necessary to be there. It is only since last year that the steps of the throne have been crowded with ladies; formerly one or two got in, who skulked behind the throne, or were hid in Tyrwhitt's box, but now they fill the whole space, and put themselves in front with their large bonnets, without either fear or shame. April 5th, 1829 {p.199} The question was put at a little before twelve last night, and carried by 105--217 to 112 (a greater majority than the most sanguine expected)--after a splendid speech from Lord Grey and a very good one from Lord Plunket. Old Eldon was completely beat, and could make no fight at all; his speech was wretched, they say, for I did not hear it. This tremendous defeat will probably put an end to anything like serious opposition; they will hardly rally again. I dined at Chesterfield House, but nobody came to dinner. Chesterfield and his party were all at the House of Lords. I found myself almost alone with Vesey Fitzgerald, with whom I had much talk after dinner. He said that it would be a long time before all the circumstances and all the difficulties relating to their proceedings were known, but when they were it would be seen how great had been the latter, how curious the former; that the day the Chancellor, the Duke, and Peel were with the King they actua
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

speech

 

dinner

 

Chesterfield

 

Chancellor

 

throne

 

bonnets

 

sanguine

 

greater

 
completely
 
majority

question

 

splendid

 
carried
 

twelve

 

Plunket

 

expected

 

circumstances

 
difficulties
 

relating

 
Fitzgerald

proceedings

 
curious
 

defeat

 

tremendous

 

wretched

 

opposition

 

extravagant

 

opinions

 

action

 

excited


peculiarity
 

sonorous

 
incident
 

CATHOLIC

 

DEBATE

 

speaking

 

excitement

 

passed

 

Holland

 

apologies


flourishing

 

pocket

 

handkerchief

 

Winchelsea

 

reading

 

Catholic

 
London
 

thinks

 

Tyrwhitt

 

skulked