FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  
Delcasse. Among other questions to be agreed upon and embodied in the treaty was the future of the Philippines. For Washington officials these Islands really constituted a _terra incognita_. Maj.-General Merritt and a number of other officials went to Paris to give evidence before the Commission. At their request, conveyed to me through the American Embassy, I also proceeded to Paris in October and expressed my views before the Commissioners, who examined me on the whole question. The Cuban debts and the future of the Philippines were really the knotty points in the entire debate. The Spanish Commissioners argued (1) that the single article in the Protocol relating to the Philippines did not imply a relinquishment of Spanish sovereignty over those Islands, but only a temporary occupation of the city, bay, and harbour of Manila by the Americans pending the conclusion of a treaty of peace. (2) That the attack on Manila, its capitulation, and all acts of force consequent thereon, committed _after_ the Protocol was signed, were unlawful because the Protocol stipulated an immediate cessation of hostilities; therefore the Commissioners claimed indemnity for those acts, a restoration to the _status quo ante_, and "the immediate delivery of the place (Manila) to the Spanish Government" (_vide_ Annex to Protocol No. 12 of the Paris Peace Commission conference of November 3). The American Commissioners replied: (1) "It is the contention on the part of the United States that this article leaves to the determination of the treaty of peace the entire subject of the future government and sovereignty of the Philippines necessarily embodied in the terms used in the Protocol." (2) It is erroneous to suggest "that the ultimate demands of the United States in respect of the Philippines were embodied in the Protocol." (3) That there was no cable communication with Manila, hence the American commanders could not possibly have been informed of the terms of the Protocol on the day of its signature. The Spanish Commissioners, nevertheless, tenaciously persisting in their contention, brought matters to the verge of a resumption of hostilities when the American Commissioners presented what was practically an ultimatum, in which they claimed an absolute cession of the Islands, offering, however, to pay to Spain $20,000,000 gold, to agree, for a term of years, to admit Spanish ships and merchandise into the Islands on the same terms as American s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Protocol

 

Commissioners

 
American
 

Philippines

 

Spanish

 
Islands
 

Manila

 

embodied

 
future
 

treaty


States

 

United

 

sovereignty

 

article

 
entire
 

contention

 

hostilities

 

claimed

 

officials

 

Commission


demands

 

ultimate

 

Government

 

respect

 

suggest

 

leaves

 

November

 

replied

 

conference

 
determination

necessarily

 

government

 

subject

 
erroneous
 
informed
 
offering
 

cession

 

ultimatum

 
absolute
 

merchandise


practically

 
possibly
 
delivery
 
commanders
 

communication

 

signature

 
resumption
 

presented

 

matters

 

brought