6 report. See Dr. Zimmerman's report, page
20, 1932 report. Is supposed to be a rapid grower but has not proved
satisfactory in the east.

THE PATTERSON:

Submitted in 1926 contest by Mrs. William Patterson, Wever, Iowa.

THE PATUXENT:

See Mr. Reed's paper in 1931 report. Is growing in the Riehl and Kellogg
orchards.

THE PEANUT:

See Mr. Bixby's paper in 1926 report and Mr. Reed's paper in 1931
report.

THE PEARL:

See Mr. Bixby's paper in 1926 report and Mr. Reed's paper in 1931
report.

THE PINECREST:

See Dr. Zimmerman's report, page 22, 1932, and Mr. Reed's paper, page
151, 1932 report; also Mr. Stokes' paper and tests, page 110, 1932
report.

THE POWERS:

See Mr. Reed's paper in 1931 report.

THE ROHWER:

Took second prize in 1926 contest. See Mr. Reed's paper in 1931 report.
J. H. Gage, Hamilton, Ontario, has young grafts of this walnut growing
but not old enough to bear. W. R. Fickes, Wooster, Ohio, reports that
the Rohwer there is probably next to the Thomas in quality.

THE ROYAL (hybrid):

See Mr. Bixby's paper in 1926 report. Is reported to be a rapid grower
but has not proved satisfactory in the east.

THE RUDDICK:

See Mr. Reed's paper in 1931 report.

THE SCHIMMOLLER:

Entered in 1926 contest by Will T. Schimmoller, Fort Jennings, Ohio. See
Mr. Reed's paper in 1931 report.

THE STABLER:

Parent tree in Howard County, Maryland. Has been generally planted in
nut orchards but has not proved satisfactory. It is a fine cracker. E.
C. Rice, Absher, Ky., reports it does fine there, better than Ohio. W.
R. Fickes, Wooster, Ohio, reports it is not promising there. J. H. Gage,
Hamilton, Ontario, has one tree four years of age, which bore a few nuts
in 1934. Stood last winter's weather (-30 degrees F.) with no damage
whatever.

THE STAMBAUGH:

Took first prize in 1926 contest. See Mr. Reed's paper in 1931 report.
It is being generally tested in nut orchards. J. H. Gage, Hamilton,
Ontario, has some young trees growing which are not old enough to bear.
W. R. Fickes, Wooster, Ohio, reports the Stambaugh there is heavily
veined, is oily, soon shrivels and is not very good quality.

THE STANLEY:

See Dr. Zimmerman's report, page 22, 1932, and Mr. Stokes' paper with
tests, pages 108 and 110, 1932 report.

THE STEVENS:

See Dr. Zimmerman's report, page 22, 1932, and Mr. Reed's paper, page
151, and Mr. Stokes' paper with tests, pages 109 and 110, in 193