FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  
ment in J. B. Black, _The Reign of Elizabeth, 1558-1603_, (Oxford: Oxford University, 1936), pp. 174-177, applies to Virginia's county government in the colonial and early federal periods. [44] The first statute on this subject, in 1628, used the term "commissioners" (I Hening, _Statutes_, 133). In 1662, this term was replaced by "justices". P. A. Bruce, _Institutional History of Virginia in the Seventeenth Century_, (New York: Putnam, 1910), I, 488. However, Porter, _County Government_, p. 170, states that "justice of the peace" was the full title during most of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. [45] Porter, _County Government_, p. 168. [46] In 1657, for example, the House of Burgesses enacted legislation requiring that appointments be recommended by the county court and approved by the Assembly. (I Hening, _Statutes_, 402, 480) But this requirement appears to have been repealed after the restoration of Charles II. [47] Porter, _County Government_, p. 49, cites the _Calendar of State Papers_, I, 261, listing the numbers of justices in nearby counties as follows: Fauquier, 18; Prince William, 18; Loudoun, 17. [48] Charles Sydnor, _American Revolutionaries In The Making_, (New York: Collier, 1962), p. 64. [49] Hening, _Statutes_, I, 117. [50] Hening, _Statutes_, I, 305. [51] Hening, _Statutes_, II, 28, 280. [52] Porter, _County Government_, p. 42. [53] _Ibid._, pp. 27-28. [54] Hening, _Statutes_, I, 330, 484. [55] These rules included prohibitions against extortion of excessive fees, acting as lawyers in their own courts, falsifying revenue returns, multiple job-holding and the like. See Hening, _Statutes_, I, 265, 297, 330, 333, 465, 523; II, 163, 291. Porter, _County Government_, 68, comments that "the office of sheriff, judging from the number of acts which the assembly found it necessary to pass, was the problem child of ... [the 18th century], not only in regard to the duties of the office, but also in the method of appointment." [56] Shepherd, _Laws of Virginia_, I, 367. [57] _Calendar of State Papers_, IV, 416. [58] Hening, _Statutes_, XI, 352. [59] Hening, _Statutes_, IV, 350. [60] Hening, _Statutes_, II, 419; IV, 350. [61] Hening, _Statutes_, IX, 351. [62] Hening, _Statutes_, XII, 243. [63] John Wayland, _History of Rockingham County, Virginia_, (Dayton, Virginia: Ruebush-Elkins, 1912), pp. 424-425. [64] Porter, _County Government_, p. 109, citing _Calend
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Statutes

 
Hening
 
County
 

Porter

 
Government
 
Virginia
 
Papers
 

justices

 

Calendar

 

Charles


History
 
Oxford
 

office

 
county
 
returns
 

multiple

 
comments
 

revenue

 

holding

 

extortion


excessive

 

prohibitions

 

included

 

sheriff

 

lawyers

 

courts

 

acting

 
falsifying
 
citing
 

Calend


Elkins

 

Wayland

 
Rockingham
 

Dayton

 

Ruebush

 

problem

 

number

 

assembly

 

century

 
appointment

Shepherd

 

method

 

regard

 

duties

 
judging
 

nearby

 

Institutional

 

Seventeenth

 

Century

 

replaced