FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
was a middle aged man, with a kind, intellectual face. He spoke slowly and thoughtfully. When our hero entered he greeted him in a kindly way. "I am sorry to see you here, Fred," he began, "and I hope no evidence of guilt will be found against you. Though I feel a friendly interest in you, it is my duty, as you know, to decide the case impartially." "I know it is, judge," replied Fred, "and I think the evidence will prove my innocence." John Rexford now came in with his lawyer, Mr. Clarence Ham, a young man noted for his eloquence. Mr. Rexford was sworn as a witness, and deposed that he had strong grounds for believing his store was burned by an incendiary, and that he had reasons for suspecting Fred Worthington to be the guilty party, though he admitted that he had little or no real proof to sustain this belief. He gave his evidence upon the facts that led him to think the store was maliciously burned. Sheriff Coombs added his testimony upon this point. These facts, having been already given, need not be repeated. "This testimony gives no absolute proof that the store was burned by an incendiary," said the judge. "But I submit that the circumstances--the facts, if you please--lead to that conclusion," put in attorney Ham. "To be sure, they give rise to a strong suspicion that it was, but unless we get further testimony to this end, the court cannot hold the prisoner for trial." Mr. Rexford now gave his evidence, showing why he suspected Fred of being the guilty party. This being simply a hearing before a justice, Mr. Farrington was allowed to serve Fred in place of a lawyer. "You say," said Mr. Farrington, addressing the witness, "you thought at the time you discharged Fred Worthington from your employ that some sort of revenge would follow. Will you kindly state why you thought so?" "His manner indicated it." "In what way, please?" "He was very saucy and impudent." "In what manner was he impudent?" "He threatened me." "Simply because you informed him you wouldn't need his services longer?" "Well, yes, that is about it," answered the witness hesitatingly. "The court would like to know the exact facts," said Judge Plummer. "I shall endeavor to give them," answered the witness. "Then please state in what way he threatened you," said Mr. Farrington. "It was in his manner. I had to conciliate him to save trouble. I was absolutely afraid of him." "In what way did you conc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

evidence

 

witness

 
Rexford
 

manner

 

Farrington

 

testimony

 
burned
 
lawyer
 

impudent

 
guilty

threatened

 
strong
 

incendiary

 

thought

 

Worthington

 

answered

 

kindly

 
allowed
 

discharged

 
simply

addressing

 

hearing

 

suspected

 

showing

 

justice

 

prisoner

 

afraid

 

absolutely

 

hesitatingly

 
longer

endeavor
 

trouble

 

Plummer

 

services

 

conciliate

 
follow
 

revenge

 

employ

 
informed
 
wouldn

Simply

 

Coombs

 

interest

 

decide

 

friendly

 

Though

 

impartially

 

replied

 

eloquence

 

Clarence