FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67  
68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   >>   >|  
istocene of Europe has yielded nearly related fossils,[2] and a peculiar and probably rather later form comes from New Jersey and Kentucky. This last in some respects suggests a resemblance to the wapiti, but it is unlikely that the similarity is more than superficial, and as moose not distinguishable from the existing species are found in the same formation, it is improbable that _Cervalces_ bore to _AIces_ anything more than a collateral relationship. [Footnote 2: The huge fossil known as "Irish elk" is really a fallow deer and in no way nearly related to the moose.] Even to an uncritical eye, the differences between ungulates and carnivores of to-day are many and obvious, but as we trace them back into the past we follow on converging lines, and in our search for the prototypes of the carnivora we are led to the _Creodonta_, contemporary with _Condylarthra_, which we have seen giving origin to hoofed beasts, but outlasting them into the succeeding age. These two groups of generalized mammals approached each other so nearly in structure, that it is even doubtful to which of them certain outlying fossils should be referred, and the assumption is quite justified that they had a common ancestor in the preceding period, of which no record is yet known. The most evident points in which _Carnivora_ differ from _Ungulata_ are their possession of at least four and frequently five digits, which always bear claws and never hoofs; all but the sea otter have six small incisor teeth in each jaw; the canines are large; the molars never show flattened, curved crests after the ruminant pattern, but are more or less tubercular, and one tooth in the hinder part of each jaw becomes blade-like, for shearing off lumps of flesh. This tooth is called the sectorial, or carnassial. Existing carnivores are conveniently divided into three sections: _Arctoidea_--bears, raccoons, otters, skunks, weasels, etc.; _Canoidea_--dogs, wolves and foxes; _Aeluroidea_--cats, civets, ichneumons and hyaenas. It is highly probable that these three chief types have descended in as many distinct lines from the _Creodonta_, and that they were differentiated as early as the middle Eocene, but their exact degree of affinity is uncertain; bears and dogs are certainly closer together than either of them are to cats, and it is questionable if otters and weasels--the _Mustelidae_, as they are termed--and raccoons are really near of kin to bears. Seals a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67  
68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

weasels

 

Creodonta

 

raccoons

 
carnivores
 

otters

 

fossils

 

related

 

flattened

 

molars

 
incisor

canines

 

curved

 

ruminant

 
tubercular
 

questionable

 

Mustelidae

 

pattern

 

crests

 

termed

 

possession


points

 

Carnivora

 
differ
 

Ungulata

 

frequently

 

digits

 

distinct

 
Canoidea
 

differentiated

 
skunks

Eocene
 

middle

 
descended
 

wolves

 
highly
 

probable

 

hyaenas

 

Aeluroidea

 

civets

 

ichneumons


evident

 

Arctoidea

 

closer

 

shearing

 

uncertain

 

conveniently

 

divided

 

degree

 
sections
 

Existing