FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
ould follow. The lay lords[6] and the House of Commons found no difficulty in arriving at a conclusion. They passed a fresh penal statute with prohibitions even more emphatically stringent, and decided that "if any man brought into this realm any sentence, summons, or excommunication, contrary to the effect of the statute, he should incur pain of life and members, with forfeiture of goods; and if any prelate made execution of such sentence, his temporalities should be taken from him, and should abide in the king's hands till redress was made."[7] [Sidenote: A "great council" addresses the pope, with a desire for an arrangement.] [Sidenote: The question is brought to an issue by the excommunication of the bishops.] So bold a measure threatened nothing less than open rupture. The act, however, seems to have been passed in haste, without determined consideration; and on second thoughts, it was held more prudent to attempt a milder course. The strength of the opposition to the papacy lay with the Commons.[8] When the session of parliament was over, a great council was summoned to reconsider what should be done, and an address was drawn up, and forwarded to Rome, with a request that the then reigning pope would devise some manner by which the difficulty could be arranged.[9] Boniface IX. replied with the same want of judgment which was shown afterwards on an analogous occasion by Clement VII. He disbelieved the danger; and daring the government to persevere, he granted a prebendal stall at Wells to an Italian cardinal, to which a presentation had been made already by the king. Opposing suits were instantly instituted between the claimants in the courts of the two countries. A decision was given in England in favour of the nominee of the king, and the bishops agreeing to support the crown were excommunicated.[10] The court of Rome had resolved to try the issue by a struggle of force, and the government had no alternative but to surrender at discretion, or to persevere at all hazards, and resist the usurpation. [Sidenote: A.D. 1392-3.] [Sidenote: The House of Commons declare that they will stand with the Crown to live and die,] [Sidenote: And desire the king to examine the lords spiritual and temporal how they will stand.] [Sidenote: The lay lords answer directly, and the spiritual lords indirectly, to the same effect with the Commons.] The proceedings on this occasion seem to have been unusual, and signifi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Sidenote

 

Commons

 
occasion
 
bishops
 

effect

 

statute

 
council
 

persevere

 

government

 
desire

difficulty
 

passed

 

spiritual

 

excommunication

 

brought

 

sentence

 

presentation

 

instituted

 

cardinal

 

Italian


instantly

 
Opposing
 
replied
 

judgment

 

Boniface

 
manner
 

arranged

 

claimants

 

daring

 
granted

prebendal
 
danger
 

disbelieved

 
analogous
 

Clement

 

declare

 
hazards
 

resist

 

usurpation

 

examine


proceedings

 

unusual

 
signifi
 

indirectly

 

directly

 

temporal

 

answer

 
discretion
 

favour

 

nominee