FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
ould follow. The lay lords[6] and the House of Commons found no difficulty in arriving at a conclusion. They passed a fresh penal statute with prohibitions even more emphatically stringent, and decided that "if any man brought into this realm any sentence, summons, or excommunication, contrary to the effect of the statute, he should incur pain of life and members, with forfeiture of goods; and if any prelate made execution of such sentence, his temporalities should be taken from him, and should abide in the king's hands till redress was made."[7] [Sidenote: A "great council" addresses the pope, with a desire for an arrangement.] [Sidenote: The question is brought to an issue by the excommunication of the bishops.] So bold a measure threatened nothing less than open rupture. The act, however, seems to have been passed in haste, without determined consideration; and on second thoughts, it was held more prudent to attempt a milder course. The strength of the opposition to the papacy lay with the Commons.[8] When the session of parliament was over, a great council was summoned to reconsider what should be done, and an address was drawn up, and forwarded to Rome, with a request that the then reigning pope would devise some manner by which the difficulty could be arranged.[9] Boniface IX. replied with the same want of judgment which was shown afterwards on an analogous occasion by Clement VII. He disbelieved the danger; and daring the government to persevere, he granted a prebendal stall at Wells to an Italian cardinal, to which a presentation had been made already by the king. Opposing suits were instantly instituted between the claimants in the courts of the two countries. A decision was given in England in favour of the nominee of the king, and the bishops agreeing to support the crown were excommunicated.[10] The court of Rome had resolved to try the issue by a struggle of force, and the government had no alternative but to surrender at discretion, or to persevere at all hazards, and resist the usurpation. [Sidenote: A.D. 1392-3.] [Sidenote: The House of Commons declare that they will stand with the Crown to live and die,] [Sidenote: And desire the king to examine the lords spiritual and temporal how they will stand.] [Sidenote: The lay lords answer directly, and the spiritual lords indirectly, to the same effect with the Commons.] The proceedings on this occasion seem to have been unusual, and signifi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Sidenote

 
Commons
 

occasion

 
bishops
 

effect

 

statute

 

council

 

persevere

 

government

 

desire


difficulty

 

passed

 
spiritual
 

excommunication

 

brought

 

sentence

 
presentation
 

instituted

 
cardinal
 

Italian


instantly
 

Opposing

 

replied

 

judgment

 

Boniface

 

manner

 

arranged

 

claimants

 

daring

 

granted


prebendal

 

danger

 

disbelieved

 
analogous
 
Clement
 

declare

 

hazards

 
resist
 

usurpation

 

examine


proceedings

 

unusual

 

signifi

 

indirectly

 

directly

 
temporal
 

answer

 
discretion
 

favour

 

nominee