FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107  
108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   >>   >|  
f this in the writings of St. Francis de Sales (contemporary with Shakespeare). "Charity," he says, "comprehends the seven gifts of the Holy Ghost, and resembles a beautiful Flower-de-luce, which has six leaves whiter than snow, and in the middle the pretty little golden hammers" ("Philo," book xi., Mulholland's translation). This description will in no way fit the Iris, but it may very well be applied to the White Lily. Chaucer, too, seems to connect the Fleur-de-luce with the Lily-- "Her nekke was white as the Flour de Lis." These are certainly strong authorities for saying that the Flower-de-luce is the Lily. But there are as strong or stronger on the other side. Spenser separates the Lilies from the Flower-de-luces in his pretty lines-- "Strow mee the grounde with Daffadown-Dillies, And Cowslips, and Kingcups, and loved Lillies; The Pretty Pawnce And the Chevisaunce Shall match with the fayre Floure Delice." _Shepherd's Calendar._ Ben Jonson separates them in the same way-- "Bring rich Carnations, Flower-de-luces, Lillies." Lord Bacon also separates them: "In April follow the double White Violet, the Wall-flower, the Stock-Gilliflower, the Cowslip, the Flower-de-luces, and Lilies of all Natures;" and so does Drayton-- "The Lily and the Flower de Lis For colours much contenting." _Nymphal V._ In heraldry also the Fleur-de-lis and the Lily are two distinct bearings. Then, from the time of Turner in 1568, through Gerard and Parkinson to Miller, all the botanical writers identify the Iris as the plant named, and with this judgment most of our modern writers agree.[99:1] We may, therefore, assume that Shakespeare meant the Iris as the flower given by Perdita, and we need not be surprised at his classing it among the Lilies. Botanical classification was not very accurate in his day, and long after his time two such celebrated men as Redoute and De Candolle did not hesitate to include in the "Liliacae," not only Irises, but Daffodils, Tulips, Fritillaries, and even Orchids. What Iris Shakespeare especially alluded to it is useless to inquire. We have two in England that are indigenous--one the rich golden-yellow (_I. pseudacorus_), which in some favourable positions, with its roots in the water of a brook, is one of the very handso
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107  
108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Flower

 

Lilies

 

separates

 
Shakespeare
 
Lillies
 

writers

 

flower

 

strong

 
pretty
 

golden


modern
 

judgment

 

Parkinson

 

contenting

 

Nymphal

 

heraldry

 

colours

 

Natures

 
Drayton
 

distinct


Miller

 

assume

 

botanical

 

identify

 

Gerard

 

bearings

 

Turner

 

classification

 

alluded

 

useless


inquire

 

Orchids

 
Daffodils
 

Tulips

 

Fritillaries

 

England

 

indigenous

 
handso
 
positions
 

favourable


yellow

 
pseudacorus
 

Irises

 

classing

 
Botanical
 
accurate
 

surprised

 

Perdita

 

Candolle

 

hesitate