FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>   >|  
suppose that it was printed from any copy other than the First, they may be merely the result of carelessness. FIRST EDITION SECOND EDITION p. 3, line 4, enthron'd, with inthron'd with 3 8, Arts ... steps Art's ... step's 11 10, Rods; Rods? 13 26, to Descend do Descend 14 17, couch, couch 29 9, Cedar Cedars 31 21, Temples Temple [Footnote 8: "The Attacks on John Dryden," _Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association_, XXI, 41-74.] [Footnote 9: Joseph Spence, _Anecdotes ... of Books and Men_ (1858), p. 51.] For "No Link ... night" (p. 35, lines 19-24), the Second Edition substitutes, for an undetermined reason, the following: No less the Lordly Zelecks Glory sound For courage and for Constancy renoun'd: Though once in naught but borrow'd plumes adorn'd, So much all servile Flattery he scorn'd; That though he held his Being and Support, By that weak Thread the Favour of a Court, In Sanhedrims unbrib'd, he firmly bold Durst Truth and Israels Right unmov'd uphold; In spight of Fortune, still to Honour wed, By Justice steer'd, though by Dependence fed. Very little can be said of Pordage's poem, beyond its date of publication (January 17, 1681/2)[10] and the fact that no parallel has been found with his earlier work. As no detailed study on him, published or unpublished, has been traced, we can only have recourse to the standard works on the period; data thus easily accessible are not therefore reproduced here. A so-called second edition (MacDonald 205b) is identical with the first. [Footnote 10: _Modern Philology_, XXV (1928) 409-416.] In conclusion a few comments may be made on the general situation into which the poems fit. It will be remembered that _Absalom and Achitophel_ appeared after the Exclusion Bill, the purpose of which was to debar James Duke of York from the Protestant succession, had been rejected by the House of Lords, mainly through the efforts of Halifax. Dryden's poem was advertised on November 17, 1681, and we may safely assume that it was published only a short time before Settle and our other authors were hired by the Whigs to answer it. Full details have not survived; one suspects Shaftesbury's Green Ribbon Club. That such replies were considered necessary testifies both to the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Descend

 

Dryden

 

published

 

EDITION

 

reproduced

 
edition
 

Modern

 

Philology

 

identical


called

 

MacDonald

 

period

 

detailed

 
parallel
 

earlier

 

unpublished

 

traced

 

easily

 

accessible


publication
 

recourse

 

January

 
standard
 
Achitophel
 

Settle

 

authors

 

answer

 

advertised

 

Halifax


November

 

safely

 

assume

 

details

 

replies

 

considered

 

testifies

 
Ribbon
 

survived

 

suspects


Shaftesbury

 

efforts

 
remembered
 
Absalom
 

appeared

 

comments

 
general
 

situation

 
Exclusion
 

succession