FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  
s not only Monsieur _Bayle_ himself, but every body else that writes of him allows) I think it will be a hard matter to persuade a disinteress'd Person, or any other but a _bon Francois_, (which, in good _English_, is a _Lover of his Chains_) that here is any just Reason shewn why _Hotoman_ shou'd be blam'd. Monsieur _Teissier_, altho' very much prejudiced against him, was (as one may see by the Tenor of the above Quotation, and his leaving it thus uncommented on) in his Heart convinc'd of the Truth of it; but no _bon Francois_ dares own so much. He was a little too careless when he wrote against _Hotoman_, mistaking one of his Books for another; _viz._ his Commentary _ad titulum institutionum de Actionibus_, for his little Book _de gradibus cognationis_; both extremely esteemed by all learned Men, especially the first: Of which Monsieur _Bayle_ gives this Testimony: "_La beaute du Stile, & la connoissance des antiquites Romaines eclatoient dans cet Ouvrage, & le firent fort estimer._" _Thuanus_, that celebrated disinteress'd Historian, gives this Character in general of his Writings. "He composed (says he) several Works very profitable towards the explaining of the Civil Law, Antiquity, and all Sorts of fine Literature; which have been collected and publish'd by _James Lectius_, a famous Lawyer, after they had been review'd and corrected by the Author. _Barthius_ says, that he excelled in the Knowledge of the Civil Law, and of all genteel Learning [Footnote: _Belles Literature_] _Ceux la mesmes qui ont ecrits contre luy_ (says _Neveletus_) _tombent d'accord quil avoit beaucoup de lecture & une profonde Erudition_." The Author of the _Monitoriale adversus Italogalliam_, which some take to be _Hotoman_ himself, has this Passage relating to the _Francogallia_: "Quomodo potest aliquis ei succensere qui est tantum relator & narrator facti? _Francogallista_ enim tantum narrationi & relationi simplici vacat, quod si aliena dicta delerentur, charta remaneret alba." It was objected to him, that he unawares furnish'd the Duke of _Guise_ and the _League_ at _Paris_ with Arguments to make good their Attempts against their Kings. This cannot be deny'd; but at the same time it cannot be imputed to _Hotoman_ as any Crime: Texts of Scripture themselves have been made use of for different Purposes, according to the Passion or the Interests of Parties. Arguments do not lose their native Force for being wrong apply'd: If the Thre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Hotoman
 

Monsieur

 

Arguments

 
tantum
 

Literature

 
Francois
 

disinteress

 

Author

 

Monitoriale

 

Quomodo


adversus

 
Italogalliam
 

potest

 

Passage

 

relating

 

Francogallia

 

Erudition

 

aliquis

 

succensere

 
contre

genteel

 

Knowledge

 
Learning
 

Footnote

 

Belles

 

excelled

 

Barthius

 
review
 

corrected

 
mesmes

beaucoup

 

lecture

 

accord

 

tombent

 
ecrits
 

Neveletus

 

profonde

 
Scripture
 

imputed

 

Purposes


native

 
Interests
 

Passion

 

Parties

 

Attempts

 

aliena

 

simplici

 

relationi

 

narrator

 

Francogallista