FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
opitious to the bearer of good tidings, the gospel messenger, and he took it. "Suppose yourself now in the presence of God," he said, in a low voice, mysteriously; "what would you say to Him?" Madame Graslin stopped as though struck by a thunderbolt; she shuddered; then she said simply, in tones that brought tears to the rector's eyes:-- "I should say, as Jesus Christ said: 'Father, why hast thou forsaken me?'" "Ah! Magdalen, that is the saying I expected of you," cried Monsieur Bonnet, who could not help admiring her. "You see you are forced to appeal to God's justice; you invoke it! Listen to me, madame. Religion is, by anticipation, divine justice. The Church claims for herself the right to judge the actions of the soul. Human justice is a feeble image of divine justice; it is but a pale imitation of it applied to the needs of society." "What do you mean by that?" "You are not the judge of your own case, you are dependent upon God," said the priest; "you have neither the right to condemn yourself nor the right to absolve yourself. God, my child, is a great reverser of judgments." "Ah!" she exclaimed. "He _sees_ the origin of things, where we see only the things themselves." Veronique stopped again, struck by these ideas, that were new to her. "To you," said the brave priest, "to you whose soul is a great one, I owe other words than those I ought to give to my humble parishioners. You, whose mind and spirit are so cultivated, you can rise to the sense divine of the Catholic religion, expressed by images and words to the poor and childlike. Listen to me attentively, for what I am about to say concerns you; no matter how extensive is the point of view at which I place myself for a moment, the case is yours. _Law_, invented to protect society, is based on equality. Society, which is nothing but an assemblage of acts, is based on inequality. There is therefore lack of harmony between act and law. Ought society to march on favored or repressed by law? In other words, ought law to be in opposition to the interior social movement for the maintenance of society, or should it be based on that movement in order to guide it? All legislators have contented themselves with analyzing acts, indicating those that seemed to them blamable or criminal, and attaching punishments to such or rewards to others. That is human law; it has neither the means to prevent sin, nor the means to prevent the return to sinfulne
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
justice
 

society

 

divine

 
Listen
 

priest

 

things

 

stopped

 

movement

 
struck
 
prevent

spirit

 

parishioners

 

extensive

 

humble

 

images

 

expressed

 

childlike

 

attentively

 

moment

 
religion

Catholic
 

cultivated

 
matter
 

concerns

 

indicating

 

blamable

 

analyzing

 
legislators
 
contented
 

criminal


attaching
 

return

 

sinfulne

 

punishments

 

rewards

 

maintenance

 

assemblage

 

inequality

 

Society

 

invented


protect

 

equality

 

harmony

 
opposition
 

interior

 

social

 

repressed

 

favored

 

absolve

 

Father