FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  
theologians.(165) Plato and Aristotle, moreover, from the continuous motion of all matter, inferred a prime cause, an unmoved mover. This is the so-called _cosmological_ proof, used by different schools in varying forms.(166) It occupies the foremost place in the systems of the Arabic Aristotelians, and consequently is dominant among the Jewish philosophers, the Christian scholastics, and in the modern philosophic schools down to Kant. It is based upon the old principle of causality, and therefore takes the mutability and relativity of all beings in the cosmos as evidence of a Being that is immutable, unconditioned, and absolutely necessary, causa sui, the prime cause of all existence. 7. The Mohammedan theologians added a new element to the discussion. In their endeavor to prove that the world is the work of a Creator, they pointed as evidence to the multiformity and composite structure, the contingency and dependency of the cosmos; thus they concluded that it must have been created, and that its Creator must necessarily be the one, absolute, and all-determining cause. This proof is used also by Saadia and Bahya ben Joseph.(167) Its weakness, however, was exposed by Ibn Sina and Alfarabi among the Mohammedans, and later by Abraham ibn Daud and Maimonides, their Jewish successors as Aristotelians. These proposed a substitute argument. From the fact that the existence of all cosmic beings is merely possible,--that is, they may exist and they may not exist,--these thinkers concluded that an absolutely necessary being must exist as the cause and condition of all things, and this absolutely unconditioned yet all-conditioning being is God, the One who _is_.(168) Of course, the God so deduced and inferred is a mere abstraction, incapable of satisfying the emotional craving of the heart. 8. While the cosmological proof proceeds from the transitory and imperfect nature of the world, the _ontological_ proof, first proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, the Christian scholastic of the XI century, and further elaborated by Descartes and Mendelssohn, proceeds from the human intellect. The mind conceives the idea of God as an absolutely perfect being, and, as there can be no perfection without existence, the conclusion is that this idea must necessarily be objectively true. Then, as the idea of God is innate in man, God must necessarily exist,--and for proof of this they point to the Scriptural verse, "The fool hath said in his heart,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

absolutely

 
existence
 

necessarily

 
Christian
 

unconditioned

 

inferred

 
Jewish
 

proposed

 

cosmos

 

beings


evidence

 
Creator
 

cosmological

 

concluded

 

Aristotelians

 

proceeds

 

schools

 
theologians
 

successors

 

incapable


deduced

 

abstraction

 

Maimonides

 

thinkers

 

satisfying

 
cosmic
 
argument
 

condition

 
things
 

substitute


conditioning
 

conclusion

 

objectively

 

perfection

 
perfect
 

innate

 

Scriptural

 

conceives

 
nature
 

ontological


Abraham

 
Anselm
 

imperfect

 

transitory

 

craving

 
Canterbury
 

scholastic

 
Mendelssohn
 

intellect

 

Descartes