FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203  
204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   >>   >|  
nd whence is the money to be obtained? Here we join issue with those Socialist writers who advocate the endowment of motherhood and give it their own meaning; and that is why in a preceding paragraph the word fundamental has been emphasized, since in the endowment of motherhood as understood by socialists there are two principles, one which I call fundamental, and a second--that the endowment shall be by the State--which now falls to be considered. I do not see how any one can challenge the following sentences from Mr. H. G. Wells: "So the monstrous injustice of the present time which makes a mother dependent upon the economic accidents of her man, which plunges the best of wives and the most admirable of children into abject poverty if he happens to die, which visits his sins of waste and carelessness upon them far more than upon himself, will disappear. So too the still more monstrous absurdity of women discharging their supreme social function, bearing and rearing children in their spare time, as it were, while they earn their living by contributing some half mechanical element to some trivial industrial product, will disappear."[18] But the remarkable circumstance is that Mr. Wells proposes to remedy these consequences of, for instance, "sins of waste and carelessness," not by dealing with those sins but by the simple method that "a woman with healthy and successful offspring will draw a wage for each one of them from the State so long as they go on well. It will be her wage. Under the State she will control her child's upbringing. How far her husband will share in the power of direction is a matter of detail upon which opinion may vary--and does vary widely amongst Socialists." How far a father is to share in directing his children's upbringing is "a matter of detail," we are told. The phrase suffices to show that whatever we are dealing with here is either sheer fantasy or else thinking of so crude a kind as to be unworthy of the name. Since early in the history of the fishes paternal responsibility has been a factor of ascending evolution. It has ever been a more and more responsible thing to be a father. It is now proposed to reduce fatherhood to the purely physiological act--as amongst, shall we say, the simpler worms; and the proposal is only "a matter of detail." Probably we had better go our own way, and waste no more time upon this kind of thing. Th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203  
204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

matter

 

detail

 
children
 

endowment

 

disappear

 
upbringing
 

dealing

 

father

 

monstrous

 

carelessness


fundamental

 

motherhood

 
simple
 

instance

 
widely
 
control
 
opinion
 

successful

 

offspring

 

direction


healthy

 

husband

 
method
 

purely

 

fatherhood

 

physiological

 
reduce
 

proposed

 

ascending

 

evolution


responsible

 

simpler

 

proposal

 

Probably

 

factor

 

responsibility

 

suffices

 
directing
 

phrase

 

fantasy


history

 

fishes

 
paternal
 
consequences
 

thinking

 

unworthy

 

Socialists

 
discharging
 

considered

 

principles