FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
o Mr. Rogers his intention to take a part in the discussion, a communication was, by the intervention of that gentleman, opened between the noble poet and Lord Holland, who, with his usual courtesy, professed himself ready to afford all the information and advice in his power. The following letters, however, will best explain their first advances towards acquaintance. LETTER 88. TO MR. ROGERS. "February 4. 1812. "My dear Sir, "With my best acknowledgments to Lord Holland, I have to offer my perfect concurrence in the propriety of the question previously to be put to ministers. If their answer is in the negative, I shall, with his Lordship's approbation, give notice of a motion for a Committee of Enquiry. I would also gladly avail myself of his most able advice, and any information or documents with which he might be pleased to intrust me, to bear me out in the statement of facts it may be necessary to submit to the House. "From all that fell under my own observation during my Christmas visit to Newstead, I feel convinced that, if _conciliatory_ measures are not very soon adopted, the most unhappy consequences may be apprehended. Nightly outrage and daily depredation are already at their height, and not only the masters of frames, who are obnoxious on account of their occupation, but persons in no degree connected with the malecontents or their oppressors, are liable to insult and pillage. "I am very much obliged to you for the trouble you have taken on my account, and beg you to believe me ever your obliged and sincere," &c. * * * * * LETTER 89. TO LORD HOLLAND. "8. St. James's Street, February 25. 1812. "My Lord, "With my best thanks, I have the honour to return the Notts, letter to your Lordship. I have read it with attention, but do not think I shall venture to avail myself of its contents, as my view of the question differs in some measure from Mr. Coldham's. I hope I do not wrong him, but _his_ objections to the bill appear to me to be founded on certain apprehensions that he and his coadjutors might be mistaken for the '_original advisers_' (to quote him) of the measure. For my own part, I consider the manufacturers as a much injured body of men, sacrificed to the views of certain individuals who
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
question
 

obliged

 

measure

 
February
 

Lordship

 

account

 

Holland

 

information

 

advice

 

LETTER


height

 
trouble
 

Street

 
HOLLAND
 
discussion
 

sincere

 

communication

 

persons

 

occupation

 

intervention


frames

 

obnoxious

 

gentleman

 

degree

 

connected

 
pillage
 

insult

 

malecontents

 

oppressors

 

liable


masters

 

coadjutors

 
mistaken
 

original

 

advisers

 

apprehensions

 

founded

 

sacrificed

 

individuals

 

manufacturers


injured
 
objections
 

attention

 

venture

 

letter

 
honour
 

return

 
depredation
 
contents
 

Coldham