FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  
which acts through itself, or that which contains in itself the ground of its changing states. Substance is to be defined by active force,[2] by which we mean something different from and better than the bare possibility or capacity of the Scholastics. The _potentia sive facultas_, in order to issue into action, requires positive stimulation from without, while the _vis activa_ (like an elastic body) sets itself in motion whenever no external hindrance opposes. Substance is a being capable of action (_la substance est un etre capable d'action_). With the equation of activity and existence (_quod non agit, non existit_) the substantiality which Spinoza had taken away from individual things is restored to them: they are active, consequently, in spite of their limitedness, substantial beings (_quod agit, est substantia singularis_). Because of its inner activity every existing thing is a determinate individual, and different from every other being. Substance is an individual being endowed with force. [Footnote 1: According to L. Stein's conjecture, Leibnitz took the expression Monad, which he employs after 1696, from the younger (Franc. Mercurius) van Helmont.] [Footnote 2: Francis Glisson (1596-1677, professor of medicine in Cambridge and London) had as early as 1671, conceived substances as forces in his treatise _De Natura Substantiae Energetica_. That Glisson influenced Leibnitz, as maintained by H. Marion (Paris, 1880), has not been proven; cf. L. Stein, p. 184.] The atomists are right when they postulate for the explanation of phenomenal bodies simple, indivisible, eternal units, for every composite consists of simple parts. But they are wrong when they regard these invisible, minute corpuscles, which are intended to subserve this purpose as indivisible: everything that is material, however small it be, is divisible to infinity, nay, is in fact endlessly divided. If we are to find indivisible units, we must pass over into the realm of the immaterial and come to the conclusion that bodies are composed of immaterial constituents. Physical points, the atoms, are physical, but not points; mathematical points are indivisible, but not real; metaphysical or substantial points, the incorporeal, soul-like units, alone combine in themselves indivisibility and reality--the monads are the true atoms. Together with indivisibility they possess immortality; as it is impossible for them to arise and perish through the combinati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
indivisible
 

points

 
action
 

individual

 
Substance
 

immaterial

 

Leibnitz

 
simple
 

activity

 

Footnote


active
 

substantial

 

bodies

 

Glisson

 

indivisibility

 
capable
 

consists

 
regard
 
composite
 

eternal


influenced

 

maintained

 

Marion

 

Energetica

 

treatise

 

Natura

 

Substantiae

 

atomists

 

postulate

 

explanation


proven
 

phenomenal

 

metaphysical

 
incorporeal
 

mathematical

 

composed

 

constituents

 

Physical

 
physical
 
combine

impossible

 

perish

 
combinati
 

immortality

 

possess

 

reality

 

monads

 

Together

 

conclusion

 

material