FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  
inate in the sensibility, so the _a priori_ conceptions and laws which underlie natural science originate in the understanding; for, on this view, the discovery of all the conceptions and laws which originate in the understanding will be at the same time the discovery of all the presuppositions of natural science. Kant therefore in the _Analytic_ has a twofold problem to solve. He has firstly to discover the conceptions and laws which belong to the understanding as such, and secondly to vindicate their application to individual things. Moreover, although it is obvious that the conceptions and the laws of the understanding must be closely related,[5] he reserves them for separate treatment. [5] E. g. the conception of 'cause and effect', and the law that 'all changes take place according to the law of the connexion between cause and effect'. The _Analytic_ is accordingly subdivided into the _Analytic of Conceptions_ and the _Analytic of Principles_. The _Analytic of Conceptions_, again, is divided into the _Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories_, the aim of which is to discover the conceptions of the understanding, and the _Transcendental Deduction of the Categories_, the aim of which is to vindicate their validity, i. e. their applicability to individual things. It should further be noticed that, according to Kant, it is the connexion of the _a priori_ conceptions and laws underlying natural science with the _understanding_ which constitutes the main difficulty of the vindication of their validity, and renders necessary an answer of a different kind to that which would have been possible, if the validity of mathematical judgements had been in question. "We have been able above, with little trouble, to make comprehensible how the conceptions of space and time, although _a priori_ knowledge, must necessarily relate to objects and render possible a synthetic knowledge of them independently of all experience. For since an object can appear to us, i. e. be an object of empirical perception, only by means of such pure forms of sensibility, space and time are pure perceptions, which contain _a priori_ the condition of the possibility of objects as phenomena, and the synthesis in space and time has objective validity." "On the other hand, the categories of the understanding do not represent the conditions under which objects are given in perception; consequently, objects can certainly appear to us wi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

understanding

 

conceptions

 
Analytic
 

validity

 
objects
 

priori

 

science

 

natural

 

individual

 

things


knowledge

 
effect
 

perception

 

vindicate

 
originate
 
Conceptions
 
sensibility
 

discovery

 

object

 
Deduction

discover
 

Categories

 

connexion

 

relate

 
question
 
judgements
 

mathematical

 

render

 

comprehensible

 

trouble


necessarily
 

empirical

 

objective

 

phenomena

 

synthesis

 

categories

 

conditions

 

represent

 

possibility

 
condition

experience

 
independently
 
perceptions
 

synthetic

 

divided

 
application
 

Moreover

 
belong
 

firstly

 
obvious