FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270  
271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   >>   >|  
chanical sciences. J.S. Mill argues that, scientifically, the cause of anything is the total assemblage of the conditions that precede its appearance, and that we have no right to give the name of cause to one of them exclusively of the others. The answer to this is that Mill fails to recognize that cause is a conception which we find useful in our dealings with nature, and that whatever conceptions we find useful we are justified in using. Among the conditions of an event there are always one or two that stand in specially close relation to it from our point of view; e.g. the draught of alcoholic liquor is more closely related to the man's drunkenness than is the attraction of the earth's gravity, though that also must co-operate in producing the effect. Such closely related conditions we find it convenient to single out by a term which expresses their analogy to the cause of causes, human volition. These are the questions respecting causation which are matters of present controversy; there are in addition many other points which belong to the controversies of the past. Among the most important are Aristotle's classification of causes into material, formal, efficient and final, set forth in his _Physics_ and elsewhere, and known as his doctrine of the Four Causes; Geulincx's Occasional Causes, meant as a solution of certain difficulties in the cosmology of Descartes; Leibnitz's law of Sufficient Reason; and Kant's explanation of cause and effect as an a priori category of the understanding, intended as an answer to Hume's scepticism, but very much less effective than the line of explanation suggested by Locke. The following is a list of the various technical terms connected with causation which have been distinguished by logicians and psychologists. The four Aristotelian causes are: (1) _Material cause_ ([Greek: yle]) the material out of which a thing is made; the material cause of a house is the bricks and mortar of which it is composed. (2) _Formal cause_ ([Greek: eidos, logos, to ti en einai]), the general external appearance, shape, form of a thing; the formal cause of a triangle is its triangularity. (3) _Efficient cause_ ([Greek: arche tes kineseos]), the alcohol which makes a man drunk, the pistol-bullet which kills. This is the cause as generally understood in modern usage. (4) _Final cause_ ([Greek: telos, to ou eneka]), the object for which an action is done or a thing produced; the final cause of a comm
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270  
271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

material

 

conditions

 
effect
 

closely

 
causation
 

related

 

answer

 

appearance

 

formal

 

explanation


Causes

 
Leibnitz
 

connected

 

technical

 
Descartes
 
cosmology
 
psychologists
 

solution

 

logicians

 
difficulties

distinguished
 

suggested

 

Reason

 

scepticism

 
intended
 
understanding
 

priori

 

Aristotelian

 

Sufficient

 

category


effective
 

generally

 

understood

 

modern

 

bullet

 

pistol

 

kineseos

 

alcohol

 

action

 
produced

object

 
composed
 
Formal
 

mortar

 

bricks

 
Material
 

Occasional

 
triangle
 

triangularity

 
Efficient